jukebox lean: more on my porn problem

Thursday, October 19, 2006

more on my porn problem

sorry to beat the shit out of this dead horse, but it's getting worse, and I wanted to share some of the assumed names of the servers sending me these emails. none of these people exist, which is why it frightens me that their names sound more real than real peoples' names.
they are as follows:

Elmo Knapp
Beverly Gentry
Corlton Sylvester
Ines Cameron
Fernando Dunbar
Delbert Cormier
Prince Kirkpatrick
Dianne Bergeron
and, sticking more closely to his robot heritage we have SanServ bringing up the rear.

each of these names belong to a computer or robot of some sort, and though they don't live and breathe as we do, you can see that they have their own struggles. you see, Ines and Fernando share a similar plight, as they are the products of an inter-o.s. union. Ines and Fernando's mothers were both assembled in mexico, yet their paternal bot units were built-n-bread right here in silicon valley, thereby leaving the kids with a gringo last name. moreover, their fathers are both macs. this undoubtedly caused them a great deal of idenity confusion, angst, and packet loss.

i'm not really sure what Elmo's story is but i bet it involves an affinity for knives.

No comments:

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

1. The Industrial Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race. They have greatly increased the life-expectancy of those of us who live in "advanced" countries, but they have destabilized society, have made life unfulfilling, have subjected human beings to indignities, have led to widespread psychological suffering (in the Third World to physical suffering as well) and have inflicted severe damage on the natural world. "You do not understand me. I do not expect you to. You are not capable of it. I am beyond your experience. I am beyond good and evil. Legions of the night, night breed, repeat not the errors of night prowler and show no mercy. I will be avenged. Lucifer dwells within us all."The continued development of technology will worsen the situation. It will certainly subject human beings to greater indignities and inflict greater damage on the natural world, it will probably lead to greater social disruption and psychological suffering, and it may lead to increased physical suffering even in "advanced" countries.
2. The industrial-technological system may survive or it may break down. If it survives, it MAY eventually achieve a low level of physical and psychological suffering, but only after passing through a long and very painful period of adjustment and only at the cost of permanently reducing human beings and many other living organisms to engineered products and mere cogs in the social machine. Furthermore, if the system survives, the consequences will be inevitable: There is no way of reforming or modifying the system so as to prevent it from depriving people of dignity and autonomy.
3. If the system breaks down the consequences will still be very painful. But the bigger the system grows the more disastrous the results of its breakdown will be, so if it is to break down it had best break down sooner rather than later.
4. We therefore advocate a revolution against the industrial system.